In March 2020, several journal publishers introduced fast-tracked peer review for papers related to COVID-19, cutting the time from submission to publication in half.
While concerns over the move’s impact on research quality were predictable, the flow-on effect of a kinder peer review process was less so.
A new study has found that reviewers of COVID-19 papers provided more constructive feedback, such as suggestions to tone down conclusions rather than go back to the lab to do more time-consuming experiments.
Read full article here